Research funded by the Department of Health ‘What Happened Next’ (2014) has examined decision-making for children in care proceedings and has found that:
- Decisions made in care proceedings can contribute to reducing the odds of poor developmental outcomes for ‘maltreated’ (sic) children.
- Substitute families and apparent changes in birth families were associated with improvements in the children’s relationships and adaptation.
- After care proceedings, children remain exceptionally vulnerable due to the impact of early harm and their complex attachment histories.
- Problems in emotional regulation and with learning persist and are not significantly reduced by changes in caregiving environment.
- Most children continue to experience difficulties, particularly in relation to their ability to tolerate frustration and control impulses, and in coping with stressful events.
- Insufficient investment in children from relevant services following proceedings.
- Need for support and services to become systematically more remedial and therapeutic in practice.
The research is worth reading in full. Reference: Mulcahy, G., Badger, J., Wright, H., & Erskine, C. (2014). ‘What happened next’: a study of outcomes for maltreated children following care proceedings. Adoption & Fostering, 38(4), 314-330.
Good practice guidance for IROs, social workers and Cafcass practitioners already exists.
Download at source: Good Practice Guidance for Social Work practised in the Family Courts
COMMENTS can be added here. Please see our privacy policy. We may remove any posts that do not adhere to our guidance on the acceptable use of the partnership’s social media pages.