Children’s minister Edward Timpson has rubbished claims that government plans to allow local authorities to apply for exemptions from children’s social care legislation could affect children’s rights or pave the way for privatisation.
Story by Neil Puffett | 24 October 2016 | Children & Young People Now
“Let me be clear: we do not want to privatise child protection services and we will not privatise child protection services.
“Indeed, there are already clear legislative restrictions on the outsourcing of children’s social care functions. It was never the intention to use the power to innovate to revisit those.
“However, to put it beyond doubt, we are amending the Children and Social Work Bill to rule out any use of the power in that way.
“We will not remove fundamental rights or protections from children either. Our aim is to strengthen, not weaken protections.
Read the full story at source: Timpson defends exemption clause against ‘unfounded’ concerns
“let us have a debate based on facts, not on unfounded propositions” https://t.co/kDZISZSFg5
— Isabelle Trowler (@IsabelleTrowler) 24 October 2016
Also relevant
Solace Blog by Penny Thompson CBE | 21st October 2016: The importance of public service values
Community Care news editor Andy McNicholl | 20th October 2016: Government makes U-turn on plan to control new social work regulator
House of Lords Report Stage | Tuesday 18 October 2016: Lords examines Children and Social Work Bill
Guardian piece by Louise Tickle | Tuesday 18 October 2016: Social workers in fierce row over children’s bill
ADCS | 14th October 2016: Power to Innovate – DfE Policy Statement
DfE Briefing Note: Power to test different ways of working – policy statement
ADCS Elected Director, Stuart Carlton | 23rd September 2016: The Power to Innovate
ADCS Ian Thomas Chair of the Resources and Sustainability Policy Committee | 14th March 2016: Publication of Pillars & Foundations: A Think Piece The full version of this paper can be downloaded: here.
0 comments on “Timpson defends exemption clause against ‘unfounded’ concerns”